EVIDENCE OUTPUTS
- Service and instruction record
- Sub-processor list
- Location map
- Exit acknowledgement
ARCHITECTURE PATTERN · SYNTHETIC REFERENCE
Link approved providers to instructions, data flows, locations, assurance and exit work.
Engineering pattern
not a legal template
WHEN TO USE
Start only after the relevant facts, source status and system boundary are understood.
SOURCE / STATUS BOUNDARY
These IDs are verification pointers to the primary-source ledger. They are not provision mappings, applicability findings or legal conclusions.
SEQUENCE DIAGRAM
describes service, systems and instructions
ARTEFACT · register entryassess contract, security and locations
ARTEFACT · approval decisionrecords sub-processor or location changes
ARTEFACT · change taskcloses access and confirms return or deletion
ARTEFACT · exit evidenceTYPED JSON FIXTURE
This example contains no real person, provider, incident or system data. It demonstrates record boundaries, not a production schema.
{
"fixture": true,
"schemaVersion": "1.0-demo",
"pattern": "processor-and-sub-processor-register",
"subjectRef": "synthetic-only",
"payload": {
"processorRef": "processor_demo_03",
"region": "synthetic-region",
"exitState": "review_required"
}
}EVIDENCE OUTPUTS
THREAT CONSIDERATIONS
FAILURE MODES
RESEARCH / RADAR CONNECTION
Implementation teams benefit from separating legal interpretation from the engineering artefacts used to execute and test a decision.
Read From obligation to evidence: the DPDP implementation stackLink services, stores, flows and owners to a controlled change process.
Foundational practice · Review 2026-12-20Open radar rationaleLOCAL WORKSPACE NOTE
Nothing is sent anywhere. Avoid names, personal data or confidential incident details.